Home / Players / Compare / Andrew Flintoff vs David Warner

Andrew Flintoff vs David Warner

Full head-to-head breakdown across Test, ODI, T20I & IPL — batting, bowling and career records

TestCareer Stats
ODIFull Comparison
T20Head to Head
IPLFranchise Stats
A
Andrew Flintoff
England
Bowling Allrounder
VS
D
David Warner
Australia
Batsman

Andrew Flintoff vs David Warner: Why the Stats Make This a One-Sided Comparison

David Warner leads this head-to-head 0–20 across batting categories, pulling ahead convincingly — with the strongest edge coming in Test cricket, where David Warner averages 44.6 compared to Andrew Flintoff's 31.78.

In ODI cricket, David Warner leads with an average of 45.01 versus Andrew Flintoff's 32.02 — a significant gap of 12.99 runs per dismissal. David Warner leads on total ODI runs (6,932 vs 3,394). David Warner's 22 ODI centuries to Andrew Flintoff's 3 shows a greater ability to cash in on big starts.

In T20 Internationals, David Warner holds the edge — averaging 33.44 at a strike rate of 142.48, while Andrew Flintoff averages 12.67 at SR 126.67. In the IPL, David Warner leads with 6,565 runs versus 62 — a gap that reflects both opportunity and impact in franchise cricket.

Both players contribute with the ball. Andrew Flintoff leads on international wickets (400 vs 4 across formats), and their all-round contributions add meaningful value beyond batting averages alone.

TEST Batting — Key Metrics
Andrew Flintoff Stat David Warner
79
M
112
130
Inn
205
3845
Runs
8786
167
HS
335
31.78
Avg
44.6
62.05
SR
70.20
5
100s
26
26
50s
37
513
4s
1036
82
6s
69
17
Ducks
13
9
NO
8
Overall Profile — TEST
Key Stats — TEST

📤 Share this Andrew Flintoff vs David Warner comparison

Share Share
🏆

The Verdict

David Warner takes this comparison 0–20 across batting categories. A higher Test average (44.6 vs 31.78) and ODI average (45.01 vs 32.02) mean David Warner leads in both prestige formats.

Frequently Asked — Andrew Flintoff vs David Warner

David Warner leads 0–20 across the batting categories included in this comparison. David Warner has the higher batting average in both Test cricket (44.6) and ODI cricket (45.01).

David Warner holds the edge in ODI batting average, averaging 45.01 with 6932 runs, compared to Andrew Flintoff's average of 32.02 and 3394 runs. David Warner has also scored more ODI centuries (22 vs 3).

In Test cricket, David Warner averages 44.6 versus Andrew Flintoff's 31.78 — a significant gap of 12.82 runs per dismissal. David Warner has accumulated 8,786 Test runs including 26 centuries.

In T20Is, David Warner averages 33.44 at a strike rate of 142.48, while Andrew Flintoff averages 12.67 at a strike rate of 126.67. David Warner has the higher strike rate (142.48 vs 126.67).

David Warner leads in IPL run-scoring with 6,565 runs at a strike rate of 139.78, compared to Andrew Flintoff's 62 runs. David Warner also leads in IPL sixes (235 vs 2), reflecting a more aggressive approach in franchise cricket.

Both players have contributed with the ball. Andrew Flintoff has taken 400 international wickets compared to David Warner's 4. Andrew Flintoff has the lower white-ball economy rate (5.42 vs 8).

Both Andrew Flintoff and David Warner achieve their highest batting averages in ODIs. Andrew Flintoff averages 32.02 compared to David Warner's 45.01 in that format.

Top

We use cookies for analytics and personalised advertising. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Privacy Policy