Home / Players / Compare / Shivnarine Chanderpaul vs Mitchell Starc

Shivnarine Chanderpaul vs Mitchell Starc

Full head-to-head breakdown across Test, ODI, T20I & IPL — batting, bowling and career records

TestCareer Stats
ODIFull Comparison
T20Head to Head
IPLFranchise Stats
S
Shivnarine Chanderpaul
West Indies
Batsman
VS
M
Mitchell Starc
Australia
Bowler

Shivnarine Chanderpaul vs Mitchell Starc: Complete Head-to-Head — Batting, Bowling & All Formats Compared

Shivnarine Chanderpaul leads this head-to-head 11–5 across batting categories, holding a clear advantage — with the strongest edge coming in Test cricket, where Shivnarine Chanderpaul averages 51.37 compared to Mitchell Starc's 20.15.

In ODI cricket, Shivnarine Chanderpaul leads with an average of 41.41 versus Mitchell Starc's 11.66 — a massive gap of 29.75 runs per dismissal. Shivnarine Chanderpaul has also accumulated more ODI runs overall (8,778 vs 583). Shivnarine Chanderpaul's 11 ODI centuries to Mitchell Starc's 0 underlines who converts more often under pressure.

In T20 Internationals, Shivnarine Chanderpaul holds the edge — averaging 20.18 at a strike rate of 98.85, while Mitchell Starc averages 9.8 at SR 98. In the IPL, Mitchell Starc leads with 111 runs versus 25 — a gap that reflects both opportunity and impact in franchise cricket.

Both players contribute with the ball. Mitchell Starc leads on international wickets (771 vs 23 across formats), and their all-round contributions add meaningful value beyond batting averages alone.

TEST Batting — Key Metrics
Shivnarine Chanderpaul Stat Mitchell Starc
164
M
107
280
Inn
157
11867
Runs
2498
203
HS
99
51.37
Avg
20.15
43.32
SR
59.09
30
100s
0
66
50s
13
1285
4s
256
36
6s
49
15
Ducks
17
49
NO
33
Overall Profile — TEST
Key Stats — TEST

📤 Share this Shivnarine Chanderpaul vs Mitchell Starc comparison

Share Share
🏆

The Verdict

Based on major batting metrics such as runs, average, centuries, strike rate, and ICC achievements, Shivnarine Chanderpaul leads in most categories. Leading in both Test average (51.37 vs 20.15) and ODI average (41.41 vs 11.66), Shivnarine Chanderpaul makes the stronger case across the two most respected formats in the game.

Frequently Asked — Shivnarine Chanderpaul vs Mitchell Starc

Shivnarine Chanderpaul leads 11–5 across the batting categories included in this comparison. Shivnarine Chanderpaul has the higher batting average in both Test cricket (51.37) and ODI cricket (41.41).

Shivnarine Chanderpaul holds the edge in ODI batting average, averaging 41.41 with 8778 runs, compared to Mitchell Starc's average of 11.66 and 583 runs. Shivnarine Chanderpaul has also scored more ODI centuries (11 vs 0).

In Test cricket, Shivnarine Chanderpaul averages 51.37 versus Mitchell Starc's 20.15 — a massive gap of 31.22 runs per dismissal. Shivnarine Chanderpaul has accumulated 11,867 Test runs including 30 centuries.

In T20Is, Shivnarine Chanderpaul averages 20.18 at a strike rate of 98.85, while Mitchell Starc averages 9.8 at a strike rate of 98. Shivnarine Chanderpaul has the higher strike rate (98.85 vs 98).

Mitchell Starc leads in IPL run-scoring with 111 runs at a strike rate of 91.74, compared to Shivnarine Chanderpaul's 25 runs.

Both players have contributed with the ball. Mitchell Starc has taken 771 international wickets compared to Shivnarine Chanderpaul's 23. Shivnarine Chanderpaul has the lower white-ball economy rate (5.16 vs 6.505).

Both Shivnarine Chanderpaul and Mitchell Starc achieve their highest batting averages in Tests. Shivnarine Chanderpaul averages 51.37 compared to Mitchell Starc's 20.15 in that format.

Top

We use cookies for analytics and personalised advertising. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Privacy Policy