Full Most Wickets List
-
1Yuzvendra Chahal137 innings233Wkts8.05Econ
-
2B Kumar135 innings226Wkts7.7Econ
-
3SP Narine129 innings207Wkts6.79Econ
-
4PP Chawla126 innings192Wkts7.96Econ
-
5Jasprit Bumrah100 innings187Wkts7.34Econ
-
6R Ashwin129 innings187Wkts7.2Econ
-
7DJ Bravo110 innings183Wkts8.38Econ
-
8Ravindra Jadeja113 innings180Wkts7.7Econ
-
9Rashid Khan112 innings179Wkts7.27Econ
-
10A Mishra105 innings174Wkts7.37Econ
Who Has Taken the Most Wickets in IPL History?
Yuzvendra Chahal has taken more wickets than any bowler in IPL history — 233 in total, across 137 matches, at an economy of 8.05. B Kumar follows on 226, and SP Narine sits third with 207. Bowling in this format carries a different kind of risk than batting does: a single bad over can undo several good ones, and a bowler needs both skill and a captain willing to keep giving them the ball in pressure situations to build a wicket total like this over time.
100 bowlers appear on this list, ranked by total career wickets with no overs-bowled cutoff applied.
Why wicket-taking and economy rate can pull in opposite directions
A bowler chasing wickets aggressively — attacking the stumps, bowling fuller lengths, inviting the batter to take risks — will often concede more runs than one who prioritizes containment above all else. Yuzvendra Chahal's 8.05 economy alongside 233 wickets represents one particular balance of those two priorities, but it isn't the only path to the top of this list. Some bowlers here have built their wicket tallies through relentless pressure and tight lines that eventually force a mistake; others have taken more direct routes, bowling attacking lengths that concede boundaries in exchange for more frequent wickets.
Spinners and pace bowlers also tend to build their totals differently. A wrist-spinner operating through the middle overs against batters looking to accelerate has different wicket-taking opportunities than a fast bowler working the new ball or defending at the death, and both approaches show up across this list.
The role longevity plays in a career wicket total
Unlike a single standout season, this record compounds slowly and can stall for years at a time if a bowler loses their place in a side's attack, whether through injury, form, or simply being squeezed out by a franchise's changing bowling combinations at auction. Staying a first-choice bowler across a decade or more of IPL cricket, through multiple franchises in some cases, is itself part of what separates the names at the top of this list from bowlers with comparable per-match strike rates but shorter careers.
Comparing this list to economy rate
Checking this page against IPL's best-economy list shows which bowlers manage to combine volume and control — a genuinely uncommon achievement, since the two records tend to reward slightly different bowling approaches. A bowler who ranks highly on both lists at once is doing something most specialist wicket-takers or specialist containment bowlers don't manage.
How is this ranking calculated?
Bowlers are ordered by total wickets taken across every recorded IPL match.
Is there a minimum-overs qualification?
No — any bowler who has taken a wicket is eligible, ranked purely by career total.
Does a high wicket total mean a bowler is also economical?
Not necessarily. Wicket-taking and economy rate measure different things, and a bowler can lead this list while conceding more runs per over than someone with a far smaller wicket tally but a tighter economy.
Do spinners or pace bowlers dominate this list?
Both are well represented. Spinners often thrive through the middle overs against batters looking to accelerate, while pace bowlers get opportunities with the new ball and at the death — different phases of the innings, but both capable of producing high wicket totals over a long career.
Does this list update during the season?
Yes, after every match, and it currently tracks 100 bowlers.
Why do some bowlers with excellent strike rates rank lower here?
Strike rate measures how often a bowler takes a wicket per ball bowled, while this list measures the raw total over a career. A bowler with a shorter career or fewer overs per match can have an outstanding strike rate without ever accumulating enough overs to challenge the top of this list.