Full Most Catches List
-
1MS Dhoni116 innings158Most Catches
-
2KD Karthik110 innings145Most Catches
-
3Virat Kohli105 innings126Most Catches
-
4AB de Villiers87 innings120Most Catches
-
5SK Raina80 innings106Most Catches
-
6Ravindra Jadeja83 innings104Most Catches
-
7Rohit Sharma85 innings101Most Catches
-
8Shikhar Dhawan85 innings100Most Catches
-
9Kieron Pollard76 innings97Most Catches
-
10WP Saha69 innings93Most Catches
Who Has Taken the Most Catches in IPL History?
MS Dhoni has taken more catches than any other fielder in IPL history — 158 in total, across 116 matches. KD Karthik follows with 145, and Virat Kohli sits third at 126. Catching totals reward a mix of fielding skill, fielding position, and career longevity — a specialist close catcher or a long-serving outfielder who plays many seasons will generally accumulate more chances than an equally skilled fielder with a shorter career.
This list tracks 100 players by total career catches, including catches taken while wicketkeeping, with no minimum-matches requirement applied.
Why fielding position shapes this list more than raw ability does
Players stationed in high-traffic catching positions — close-in roles during the powerplay, or in the deep during the death overs when batters are taking the most risk — naturally get more chances than players fielding in quieter parts of the ground. Two equally talented fielders can end up with very different career catch totals purely because of where their captain and coaching staff chose to station them match after match.
MS Dhoni's 158 catches across 116 matches reflects both consistent fielding opportunity and a long enough career to compound those chances into a total that separates them from the rest of the field.
Why wicketkeepers so often lead this list
Because keeper catches are counted alongside outfield and slip catches, wicketkeepers who play long careers tend to sit near the very top of this list. A keeper is involved in more dismissal chances per match than any single outfield position on the ground, simply by standing behind the stumps for every delivery bowled, whether that's a straightforward take off a mistimed shot or a sharp reflex catch down the leg side.
That doesn't mean outfielders are absent from this list — plenty of specialist boundary and infield catchers appear well up the rankings — but the sheer volume of chances a long-serving keeper sees over a career gives them a structural edge that's hard for any single fielding position to match.
What separates a good catch from a routine one on this list
Not every catch on this list is equal in difficulty — a straightforward take at mid-off and a full-stretch diving effort on the boundary rope both count the same toward this total, even though one requires far more skill in the moment. This is a volume record rather than a difficulty-weighted one, which is worth keeping in mind when comparing fielders whose reputations rest more on spectacular moments than sheer consistency.
How is this ranking calculated?
Players are ranked by total catches taken across all recorded IPL matches, whether as a fielder or as a wicketkeeper.
Does this list include wicketkeeper catches?
Yes — all catches are counted regardless of whether the player was fielding or keeping wicket at the time of the dismissal.
Does this list update during the season?
Yes, after every match, and it currently tracks 100 players.
Why do some fielders rank higher despite playing fewer matches?
Fielding position plays a large role in this record. Players stationed in high-chance catching areas tend to accumulate catches faster than players fielding in lower-traffic parts of the ground, even across a similar number of matches played.
Is this list adjusted for the difficulty of individual catches?
No. Every completed catch counts equally toward the total, regardless of whether it was a straightforward take or a difficult diving effort.
Do wicketkeepers have a natural advantage on this list?
Yes. A wicketkeeper is involved in more dismissal chances per match than any single outfield position, simply because they're stationed behind the stumps for every ball bowled, which tends to push long-serving keepers toward the top of this list over time.